According to the Snell Website, “The Snell Foundation, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to research, education, testing and development of helmet safety standards.”
William ‘Pete’ Snell was an amateur sports car racing driver. Following a racing event in 1956, he died of head injuries sustained in a crash when the helmet he was wearing failed to protect his head adequately.
As an Avantlink and Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Disclosure Statement.
Following this tragic event the Snell Memorial Foundation was established and has been a leader in helmet safety in the United States ever since. Using scientific and medical research, standards development, helmet testing and public education the now Snell Foundation continues to ensure helmets are of the highest performing standards they could be.
What are Snell Rated Helmets?
Snell rated helmets are helmets that have been tested and certified as passing Snell’s testing.
Rather than just meeting legal requirements for sale, Snell rated helmets undergo thorough testing procedures which have been created in line with the Snell Foundation’s mission of helping to develop the highest possible safety standards for helmets.
A helmet manufacturer does not need to legally be approved by the Snell foundation in order to produce and sell helmets in the United States. DOT FMVSS 218 is the standard that manufacturers need to meet as set by the National Highways Traffic Safety Administration.
However, the general consensus is that Snell approved motorcycle helmets are more effective against head injuries than one that meets DOT’s minimum requirements.
SUGGESTED: Motorcycle Helmets for Big Heads
Up until 2019, Snell approved helmets were accepted for use by professional racers in MotoGP, however since 2019 FIM (Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme) will only accept helmets that meet FIM Racing Homologation Programme standards as announced by the Grand Prix Commission in November 2018.
Snell’s latest standard is called M2020D or M2020R. Most Snell-certified helmets in the US will be awarded the D certification. The M2020R standard is awarded to those helmets that are also approved for use in Europe.
The Snell Foundation are not funded or sponsored by any helmet manufacturers and therefore maintain their independence which helps them to gain trust and endorsements from the public.
Snell Helmet Testing
There are 6 stages helmets need to pass in order become Snell Certified:
- Impact Test. A dummy head is fitted to the helmet, it is then dropped onto a variety of surfaces. Fitted with an accelerometer, researchers can then establish how much energy the helmet absorbs, to pass the test the helmet needs to absorb no more than around 260 – 300Gs.
- Positional Stability. A check to see if the helmet remains secure on the head. Again fitted with a dummy head, a cable is fitted to the back of the helmet which is tilted at an angle. A 4KG weight is then dropped onto the helmet to simulate the helmet being ripped off the head. This is also done to the front of the helmet, as long as the helmet stays on the head, even if it moves, it passes the test.
- Retention Strap Test. A 23Kg weight followed by a 38Kg weight is attached to the retention strap and dropped to the floor, if the mechanism remains in place and the strap doesn’t stretch more than 30mm it passes.
- Chin Bar Test. A 5Kg weight is dropped onto the chin bar and as long as it doesn’t break or flex too much, the helmet passes this stage of the testing.
- Shell Penetration Test. A 3Kg spike is dropped onto the helmet to see how well it resists penetration.
- Face Shield Penetration Test. An air rifle pellet is shot at speeds of 500kph to see if it penetrates the face shield.
The 6 stages of testing above are the only tests required for standard motorcycle helmets.
Should a helmet pass all of the 6 stages it will be deemed as Snell certified and the manufacturer can sew in the Snell certification label to the inside of the helmet. Snell will continue to test the model of helmet throughout its variations and production run to ensure it maintains the standards by which it was Snell rated.
Snell vs DOT FMVSS 218
The DOT FMVSS 218 standards are the minimum requirements manufacturers have to meet in the United States. DOT testing consists of an Impact Test, Penetration Test and Strap Retention Test. The helmets tested are conditioned to 4 different environments (humidity, water immersion, low and high temperature) and need to perform in all of them in order to pass.
RECOMMENDED: Best Modular Motorcycle Helmets
Snell has 6 stages of testing, they use heavier weights in their impact and strap retention tests and simulate the tests closer to real riding conditions. For example the impact test used by the DOT standards require the helmet to be hit with a flat and round anvil above a test line; Snell drops the helmet with a dummy head inside on to surfaces that resemble tarmac etc and do not restrict where on the helmet the impact is tested.
Snell vs ECE 22:05
The Snell Foundation will argue that their testing procedures are more in depth and scientifically accurate than those laid out by the Economic Commission for Europe; the European standards are known as ECE 22:05 and are applicable not just within Europe but to many countries worldwide including Australia.
ECE testing procedures are very similar to that of Snell and include the conditioning of helmets that DOT requires; in fact they take it further and test the helmets when they are subjected to Solvents and Ultraviolet lights.
The European regulations govern all helmets that are to be manufactured where the ECE 22:05 applies so in the sense that manufacturers need to legally meet these requirements they are similar to that of DOT.
This content was originally published on headsdontbounce.com. If it appears on tonupboys.com, it is a violation of the copyright owned by headsdontbounce.com.
There is some discrepancy between Snell and ECE 22:05 standards as to which is the most efficient testing and some arguments about the science involved. More recently it has been acknowledged that helmets that flex upon impact to absorb energy are far more effective at preventing head injury than those that are very solid and hard.
SUGGESTED: Types of Motorcycle Helmet
Critics of Snell will say that the penetration test that helmets need to pass require them to be very hard shells which is not in line with modern science. Snell counteracts this by saying the impact test is the one that tests how much energy the helmet absorbs and the helmet needs to pass both in order to get Snell rated.
Fundamentally with the new Snell M2020R standards coming into play where helmets will meet both Snell and European requirements, helmets that pass either Snell or the ECE standards are of a pretty high standard compared to that of DOT.
Snell 2015 vs 2020
Snell updates their standards for testing helmets every 5 years, they do this based on new research findings and technology that may have been newly developed within that time period. It is also in line with the theory that you should change your helmet every 5 years (there are some important factors to which this can change, such as if you drop your helmet).
There has been very little change between the 2015 and 2020 standards laid out as the 2015 standards were of a very high standard. The fundamental difference is that there are now two sets of Snell standards: M2020D and M2020R. The D rating will apply to helmets just for the US and the R will be applicable to helmets that also meet European standards.
It could be argued that M2020R is Snell’s attempt to remain relevant in a world dominated by ECE 22.05 and FIM.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Is Snell better than DOT?
To obtain Snell certification a helmet is subjected to a much more intensive testing process than that which is experienced when getting tested for DOT approval. As a result, fewer helmets actually receive Snell approval as they do not pass the standards required.
The evidence suggests that the Snell standards are more effective at testing a helmet’s ability to protect a rider’s head from injury. A helmet has to pass minimum requirements laid out by DOT in order to be able to be sold in the US; whereas Snell is a not-for-profit organization whose intention is to ensure helmets do their job efficiently.
The helmets that therefore pass Snell testing are generally considered more effective than those that just pass DOT.
However, a very important side note is that not all manufacturers put forward their helmets for Snell testing as they have to do so at their own cost; therefore, it is possible that some helmets that are just DOT approved would be just as efficient as those which are Snell certified, the only problem is that there is no way of knowing this unless they go through the testing procedure.
Are Snell helmets safer?
The very fact that motorsport participants were required to use a Snell approved helmet as opposed to just a DOT approved helmet, leads me to believe that a Snell certified helmet will do a better job at protecting my head.
To pass Snell standards for certification a helmet undergoes tests that are more representative of real road conditions. An example of this being for the impact test: the helmet is tested by being dropped from multiple angles with no restriction of having the impact above a ‘test line’ on the helmet as with the DOT test.
The flaw of the DOT impact test is that the helmet can be reinforced above the test line by the manufacturer to pass the impact test; below that line which is around two thirds of the helmet, it could be much weaker and the DOT standards don’t test that area.
It is on this test alone that I feel Snell approved helmets are safer as the whole helmet is tested and there is no loophole for manufacturers to work around to get their helmets through this stage of the test. I would rather wear a helmet that is protective of my whole head rather than just the top third.
Why aren’t there Snell approved modular helmets?
There are currently no Snell approved modular helmets and there have only been 2 Snell approved modular helmets in the past.
Snell tests modular helmets as if they were a full-face helmet and held to the same standard as one, this can cause problems for modular helmets as the chin bar mechanism will be tested and expected to perform as if it is part of the solid body of the helmet.
Ride Apart conducted an interview with Edward B. Becker, Executive Director of the Snell Memorial Foundation to which his response when asked about modular helmets was that he wanted to test modular helmets and would like manufacturers to put them forward for testing.
The issue seems to be that manufacturers find it easy to get DOT approved so their helmets can be sold, and that seems to be enough for most. Even top of the line companies don’t put their modular helmets for Snell testing such as Shoei with the Neotec 2, yet the full-face Shoei X-Spirit is Snell approved.
Perhaps the cost of testing puts manufacturers off, and maybe there is a concern that a modular helmet won’t receive the same high Snell helmet rating as a full-face in their line and that will reflect badly on the modular helmet leading to less sales.
It is worth pointing out that there are some ECE 22:05 approved modular helmets that are also DOT approved. With ECE standards being much more efficient than that of DOT, if you are looking for a modular helmet specifically, maybe purchasing a model with the ECE 22:05 certification and DOT is the way to go.
How do you know if a helmet is Snell approved?
If a helmet has been Snell approved it will carry a certification label on the inside.
An easy way to check if a particular model helmet is Snell certified is to go to the Snell Foundation website and search for the helmet model. Snell maintains a list of all helmets approved with the Snell rating. You can find the search page here.
There you have it, a comprehensive guide to Snell Certification and what that means when it comes to buying a motorcycle helmet.